Write a review

MOTORCYCLE Type

Other types

Make and model

    • (223 reviews)
    • (178 reviews)
    • (170 reviews)
    • (140 reviews)
    • (133 reviews)
    • (130 reviews)
    • (128 reviews)
    • (127 reviews)
    • (117 reviews)
    • (113 reviews)
    • (107 reviews)
    • (107 reviews)
    • (106 reviews)
    • (103 reviews)
    • (94 reviews)
    • (94 reviews)
    • (88 reviews)
    • (85 reviews)
    • (83 reviews)
    • (79 reviews)
    • (74 reviews)
    • (74 reviews)
    • (72 reviews)
    • (70 reviews)
    • (67 reviews)
    • (65 reviews)
    • (64 reviews)
    • (63 reviews)
    • (63 reviews)
    • (54 reviews)
    • (50 reviews)
    • (45 reviews)
    • (44 reviews)
    • (43 reviews)
    • (43 reviews)
    • (43 reviews)
    • (43 reviews)
    • (42 reviews)
    • (39 reviews)
    • (39 reviews)
    • (36 reviews)
    • (35 reviews)
    • (32 reviews)
    • (31 reviews)
    • (26 reviews)
    • (26 reviews)
    • (24 reviews)
    • (24 reviews)
    • (24 reviews)
    • (24 reviews)
    • (21 reviews)
    • (20 reviews)
    • (20 reviews)
    • (19 reviews)
    • (18 reviews)
    • (18 reviews)
    • (16 reviews)
    • (16 reviews)
    • (15 reviews)
    • (14 reviews)
    • (14 reviews)
    • (13 reviews)
    • (12 reviews)
    • (12 reviews)
    • (12 reviews)
    • (12 reviews)
    • (11 reviews)
    • (11 reviews)
    • (11 reviews)
    • (10 reviews)
    • (10 reviews)
    • (8 reviews)
    • (7 reviews)
    • (7 reviews)
    • (7 reviews)
    • (7 reviews)
    • (7 reviews)
    • (7 reviews)
    • (6 reviews)
    • (6 reviews)
    • (6 reviews)
    • (6 reviews)
    • (6 reviews)
    • (6 reviews)
    • (5 reviews)
    • (5 reviews)
    • (5 reviews)
    • (5 reviews)
    • (4 reviews)
    • (4 reviews)
    • (4 reviews)
    • (4 reviews)
    • (4 reviews)
    • (4 reviews)
    • (4 reviews)
    • (4 reviews)
    • (4 reviews)
    • (4 reviews)
    • (4 reviews)
    • (4 reviews)
    • (4 reviews)
    • (3 reviews)
    • (3 reviews)
    • (3 reviews)
    • (3 reviews)
    • (3 reviews)
    • (3 reviews)
    • (3 reviews)
    • (3 reviews)
    • (3 reviews)
    • (3 reviews)
    • (3 reviews)
    • (3 reviews)
    • (3 reviews)
    • (3 reviews)
    • (3 reviews)
    • (2 reviews)
    • (2 reviews)
    • (2 reviews)
    • (2 reviews)
    • (2 reviews)
    • (2 reviews)
    • (2 reviews)
    • (2 reviews)
    • (2 reviews)
    • (2 reviews)
    • (2 reviews)
    • (2 reviews)
    • (2 reviews)
    • (2 reviews)
    • (2 reviews)
    • (2 reviews)
    • (2 reviews)
    • (2 reviews)
    • (2 reviews)
    • (2 reviews)
    • (2 reviews)
    • (2 reviews)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)

Year

  • No results

Kawasaki EX250 CAFE CONVERSION reviews

1.0 (0 reviews)
Write a review
Reliability
1.0
Overall quality
1.0
Performance
1.0
Comfort
1.0

Top 10 Motorcycles

Reviews

Stars Refinement

2 ratings and reviews

Voted most helpful review

Reviewed on June 2, 2017

Motorcycle reviewed 2016 Kawasaki Vulcan S Cafe view listing

5.0
The Kawasaki Vulcan S is a great pick for a starter bike. It's been reliable and fun so far, and I'm nearing the 600 mile break in period. The 650 engine out of the Ninja and Versys is re-tuned for a cruiser bike, but the speed and handling are still there. I've taken the motorcycle on a 5 and a... read more
The Kawasaki Vulcan S is a great pick for a starter bike. It's been reliable and fun so far, and I'm nearing the 600 mile break in period. The 650 engine out of the Ninja and Versys is re-tuned for a cruiser bike, but the speed and handling are still there. I've taken the motorcycle on a 5 and a half hour ride round trip and felt no discomfort, though I must say that I have the standard Ergo Fit package so your experience may vary. My friend bought a 2004 Rebel 250, a 2017 Rebel 300, and a 2014 CBR250R all due to the fact that he didn't feel like he had enough power. Starting with a 650 that handles as well as the Vulcan S remedies that, and I can guarantee as a starter you won't regret the pick.
Show less
Helpful (8)

FlagReport

Flag this review
Please select a reason
Voted most helpful review

Reviewed on August 14, 2000

Motorcycle reviewed 1998 Kawasaki EX250-F12 Ninja 250R view listing

4.0
The EX250 (Ninja 250R) by Kawasaki is a great bike for beginners and students. It is low cost, low-maintenance, and high in value. It's acceleration is good, for a 250. The EX250 costs only $3,000! I have recorded the mileage at between 65-75 mpg. The only maintenance in the past 2... read more
The EX250 (Ninja 250R) by Kawasaki is a great bike for beginners and students. It is low cost, low-maintenance, and high in value. It's acceleration is good, for a 250. The EX250 costs only $3,000! I have recorded the mileage at between 65-75 mpg. The only maintenance in the past 2 years/10,000m has been oil changes and a new rear tire. The engine has about 25 rear-wheel horsepower and a top speed of just over 100 mph stock. My insurance is only $80 a year for liability with no tickets. It is by far the best value for the money. The bike feels smoother than any other 250. It is the lowest-priced 250 you can buy. Plus, it is liquid cooled, has 4-valves/cyl. with DOHC,12.4 compression, six speeds, and is much faster than the Yamaha-Honda-Suzuki's 250. This bike was an easy choice for me. The down side is the close ratio six-speed transmission. At regular shifts, all gears are spent by 40 mph. From there, RPM's are necessary for more speed. 5,000rpm=40mph in top gear. With a simple $20 sprocket change up front, 4,500rpm=40mph. This minor addition greatly improves acceleration too. Wind can still be intimidating at speeds any higher than 80 mph. The wet weight is about 330 lbs.
Show less
Helpful (0)

FlagReport

Flag this review
Please select a reason
  • 1