Write a review

MOTORCYCLE Type

Other types

Make and model

    • (15 reviews)
    • (6 reviews)
    • (5 reviews)
    • (5 reviews)
    • (4 reviews)
    • (3 reviews)
    • (3 reviews)
    • (2 reviews)
    • (2 reviews)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)

Year

  • 5 (1 review)
  • 4.2 (1 review)
  • 4.6 (2 reviews)
  • 4.5 (1 review)
  • 4 (1 review)
  • 5 (3 reviews)
  • 5 (3 reviews)
  • 5 (2 reviews)
  • 5 (1 review)
  • 4 (1 review)
  • 4.8 (10 reviews)
  • 4 (1 review)
  • 4 (1 review)
  • 4.3 (3 reviews)
  • 3.9 (19 reviews)

2000 Royal Enfield reviews

3.7 (19 reviews)
Write a review
Reliability
3.7
Overall quality
3.7
Performance
3.7
Comfort
3.7

Top 10 Motorcycles

Reviews

Stars Refinement

19 ratings and reviews

Voted most helpful review

Reviewed on August 14, 2001

Motorcycle reviewed 2000 Royal Enfield Bullet Classic 500 view listing

4.0
I rode Blaine Newell's 500 while staying at a common friend's house last July. I rode it slowly, gently in widing country roads with only a couple of farms as signs of civilization. I was riding with no helmet and the Enfield's gentle thumping and pleasant feel made me go back in time to what... read more
I rode Blaine Newell's 500 while staying at a common friend's house last July. I rode it slowly, gently in widing country roads with only a couple of farms as signs of civilization. I was riding with no helmet and the Enfield's gentle thumping and pleasant feel made me go back in time to what it was like in the 50's. If you're looking for a "way back machine" to relive the past or see what it was like, this is the bike for you. Look elsewhere if you value speed and sophistication. Manny
Show less
Helpful (1)

FlagReport

Flag this review
Please select a reason
Voted most helpful review

Reviewed on August 1, 2001

Motorcycle reviewed 2000 Royal Enfield Bullet Classic 500 view listing

1.0
My dad bought his Bullet 500 in '97 and immediately started to have problems with it. The coil went bad and was only fixed by replacing it with a unit from a Chevrolet car because the ones from Enfield are useless. It leaks oil, the baffles in the muffler came loose, you have to be a magician... read more
My dad bought his Bullet 500 in '97 and immediately started to have problems with it. The coil went bad and was only fixed by replacing it with a unit from a Chevrolet car because the ones from Enfield are useless. It leaks oil, the baffles in the muffler came loose, you have to be a magician to crank it, everything on it vibrates, I have been totally disgusted by it ever since he bought it. I have ridden it twice. It is terribly slow. I have a 1970 cb350 Honda that outperforms this bike in every category. The brakes are terrible, it is incredibly hard to shift, I JUST don't LIKE IT, There are 2 things that I like about this motorcycle: the way it looks, and the way it sounds (Dad cut the muffler open and removed all of the guts). Oh yeah-there is one more thing I like about it: It's not mine. Let me add for its benefit that my dad loves this bike. It is different than anything else on the road, and I guess he enjoys having to work on it every time he rides it.
Show less
Helpful (0)

FlagReport

Flag this review
Please select a reason
Voted most helpful review

Reviewed on June 15, 2001

Motorcycle reviewed 2000 Royal Enfield Bullet Classic 500 view listing

4.0
I'm afraid I'm cheating a bit here...I'm writing about the 2000 Bullet 350cc Standard 12 Volt model. I'm from India, and these bikes are made there...the bikes available in India differ from the export models, the main difference being that the brake lever is on the left side and the gear... read more
I'm afraid I'm cheating a bit here...I'm writing about the 2000 Bullet 350cc Standard 12 Volt model. I'm from India, and these bikes are made there...the bikes available in India differ from the export models, the main difference being that the brake lever is on the left side and the gear lever is on the right. Yes, people, this was the original design of Royal Enfield England. I bought my bike in Feb 2000, and made a 1200KM trip after the initial engine break-in of 500KM, and in fact the complete break-in happened on this trip. Following which, my bike has been through 4 river fords, innumerable forest and hill trails, and gets a constant workout on the highway. Admitted, the top speed is not much (105Kmph is just about absolute top for a 350cc) but this bike kicks some ass! On one trip, i suffered a head-on collision with a truck which was in the wrong lane, and the front forks were mangled. In that state, my baby carried me, my pillion rider and our luggage a further 200KM to our hometown at an average speed of 95Kmph with no weaving or instability despite mangled front forks. Any other bike and i'd have been history, just a smudge on the truck's radiator...but the sheer ruggedness of the bullet saved my ass. And maintenance...spares and servicing cost less than half as much as they do for other bikes in India (mainly Japanese 100cc - 175cc pocket mosquitoes). But the best part, you never need anything major done to the bike...just keep topping up the oil, keep the battery in good shape, and some occasional grease now and then, and that's about it. Suffice to say, it's been a year and a half since I bought her, and I've already put 35,000KM on her. And this is just the beginning of a long, beautiful relationship.
Show less
Helpful (1)

FlagReport

Flag this review
Please select a reason
Voted most helpful review

Reviewed on December 22, 2000

Motorcycle reviewed 2000 Royal Enfield Bullet Classic 500 view listing

5.0
I bought my 350 Deluxe new in the sring of '94 when they first came to Canada. It has been an entertaining workhorse for my 50km round trip to work ever since. It now has 55000km on it and the only machanical failure has been a transmission bearing which cost $20 to fix and took less than two hours... read more
I bought my 350 Deluxe new in the sring of '94 when they first came to Canada. It has been an entertaining workhorse for my 50km round trip to work ever since. It now has 55000km on it and the only machanical failure has been a transmission bearing which cost $20 to fix and took less than two hours to replace. If only the Suzuki it replaced had been this well put together!
Show less
Helpful (0)

FlagReport

Flag this review
Please select a reason
Voted most helpful review

Reviewed on December 18, 2000

Motorcycle reviewed 2000 Royal Enfield Bullet Classic 500 view listing

4.0
I bought a 2000 bullet classic in Sept. i have 1300 miles on it and it is running great. The only problem I have had with the bike is a carb. Problem. The choke didn't work properly and I did a little tinkering and it works fine now. There is nothing better then riding around at 50-55 mph enjoying... read more
I bought a 2000 bullet classic in Sept. i have 1300 miles on it and it is running great. The only problem I have had with the bike is a carb. Problem. The choke didn't work properly and I did a little tinkering and it works fine now. There is nothing better then riding around at 50-55 mph enjoying the bike. I did some modifications to the bike. I took the seat off and put a solo seat and I also took off the turn signals, break light, and the plate holder. I put a tombstone light on the rear and put small lights for the turn signals. It makes a BIG improvement on the looks of the bike. I have found that if you dot like to tinker with things this bike is not for you. If you like to ride and work on bikes this is the one.
Show less
Helpful (0)

FlagReport

Flag this review
Please select a reason
Voted most helpful review

Reviewed on September 6, 2000

Motorcycle reviewed 2000 Royal Enfield Bullet Classic 500 view listing

1.0
It's slower than any 125 I ever rode. Second gear needed a major kick to find. Instruments should have been left off. Seat incredibly uncomfortable. It's sort of like riding a rorotiller that needed a tune up. This was a south Suburban Chicago dealers demo with 100 miles on it. I can't believe they... read more
It's slower than any 125 I ever rode. Second gear needed a major kick to find. Instruments should have been left off. Seat incredibly uncomfortable. It's sort of like riding a rorotiller that needed a tune up. This was a south Suburban Chicago dealers demo with 100 miles on it. I can't believe they would let anyone try it out YUCH!!!!!!
Show less
Helpful (0)

FlagReport

Flag this review
Please select a reason
Voted most helpful review

Reviewed on August 17, 2000

Motorcycle reviewed 2000 Royal Enfield Bullet Classic 500 view listing

5.0
I bought a 2000 Enfield Classic two months ago. I've put 1200 miles on it since then. It's a USA version. I own five motorcycles. I use the Enfield to relax and commute. It get 70 plus miles to the gallon in all-around driving. Mine has very little vibration from 45mph to 60mph in top gear. In... read more
I bought a 2000 Enfield Classic two months ago. I've put 1200 miles on it since then. It's a USA version. I own five motorcycles. I use the Enfield to relax and commute. It get 70 plus miles to the gallon in all-around driving. Mine has very little vibration from 45mph to 60mph in top gear. In stop-and-go traffic I have no problem out accelerating most cars, up to about 50mph. You have to shift it slow and deliberate. don't rush it or you'll get a false neutral. When it comes time to stop, make sure you give yourself time. If you relax on this bike, it is great. The same goes for the handling. It corners great, if you are smooth and don't get violent with it. I own a Yamaha FZR1000. It's always getting me in trouble. On the Enfield, I can have a good time and not worry about going to jail. I'm very happy with the stock seat. It's wide and firm. And that is necessary when you can go 200 miles with out hitting reserve. The looks and finish are very good for a $4,000 bike. I'm always receiving complements. The fastest I've had it up to so far is 75mph. The vibration at that speed was getting pretty fierce. I was still accelerating slowly at 75. But, I think the speedometer is fairly optimistic -- about 10 percent. So, 75mph indicated is probably more like 68mph actual. Am I happy with it? Yes.
Show less
Helpful (0)

FlagReport

Flag this review
Please select a reason
Voted most helpful review

Reviewed on August 17, 2000

Motorcycle reviewed 2000 Royal Enfield Bullet Classic 500 view listing

5.0
I have had a 500cc classic since April and have covered 2500 trouble-free miles on it. The bike is a first-kick starter in the mornings and thumps along happily to my place of work returning 70+mpg into the bargain. Once run in, I opened it up to see what it would do and it reached just short of... read more
I have had a 500cc classic since April and have covered 2500 trouble-free miles on it. The bike is a first-kick starter in the mornings and thumps along happily to my place of work returning 70+mpg into the bargain. Once run in, I opened it up to see what it would do and it reached just short of 90mph which indicates that the manufacturers quoted top speed of 75mph is a tad conservative. I think that sensible running in -- although a chore -- has contributed to the satisfactory performance. Maintenance is easy and therefore enjoyable. Couple this too with cheap insurance and running costs and you are riding a winner, and is not what motorcycling's all about. Do I love my bike? You bet. The only problem is the amount of people that want to stop you to talk about this handsome little machine.
Show less
Helpful (0)

FlagReport

Flag this review
Please select a reason
Voted most helpful review

Reviewed on June 6, 2000

Motorcycle reviewed 2000 Royal Enfield Bullet Deluxe 500 view listing

4.0
History: The Enfield Bullet is a plain-looking air-cooled four-stroke single with a very traditional British-bike look. The original factory in Redditch, England went bankrupt back in 1971 but a subsidiary factory in the Indian city of Madras (now called Chennai) still builds about 20,000 Bullets... read more
History: The Enfield Bullet is a plain-looking air-cooled four-stroke single with a very traditional British-bike look. The original factory in Redditch, England went bankrupt back in 1971 but a subsidiary factory in the Indian city of Madras (now called Chennai) still builds about 20,000 Bullets per year. This motorcycle is essentially a 1955 Royal Enfield Bullet with some modest updates: 12 volt electrics, some modern electrical components, and the engine is available as a 350 or an optional 500 CC version.

Starting: When in good tune they're usually easy to kick-start, but occasionally can be difficult. (At one point in India I stalled the Enfield and it took ten minutes of fussing to restart it.) It's important to have a clean spark plug, a good charge on the battery - and a strong leg! Once you do get this big thumper started, it runs pretty decently. With my Enfield here, if the engine is left cold overnight it takes a good 3 or 4 kicks to get it to fire up - but with a warm engine it's easy to restart with just one kick. Speed: The lower three gears are adequate for riding in town. For local riding I usually short-shift up to 3rd gear and cruise along at 50 to 60 KPH. There's a big gap between 3rd and 4th gear; 4th is really more of an overdrive. On the open road 85 KPH (a whopping 50 MPH!) seems to be the sweet spot, and the engine doesn't sound or feel like it's straining too hard. For a stock Enfield 500 the top speed is realistically about 110 KPH - and the engine would be working hard to do that. Handling: I find the hand controls aren't hard to use, but the steering is a bit heavy and there isn't that much turning radius. The Bullet does lean nicely into wide sweeping corners so it's fun on quiet back roads. The Bullet does have a fair amount of vibration compared to a modern thumper, but I find the 500 reasonably comfortable for short day trips.

Transmission: I'm used to gearing 'down' as I brake, but with my Indian rental bike (British-style right-side shift), 1st gear was actually up' and 2-3-4 were all down. I kept accidentally shifting into a higher gear as I slowed. I eventually got used to braking with the left foot, but it was difficult to get used to the upside-down gear shift on the right side. My Canadian Bullet has a left-side shift like a Japanese bike, and I have to say I vastly prefer this. Brakes: If you're used to a modern disc brake you'll find the Enfield's front drum is next to useless. If I squeeze hard with all four fingers I find the Enfield starts to slow rather modestly.

Show less
Helpful (0)

FlagReport

Flag this review
Please select a reason
  • 1
  • 2