Write a review

MOTORCYCLE Type

Other types

Make and model

    • (223 reviews)
    • (178 reviews)
    • (170 reviews)
    • (140 reviews)
    • (133 reviews)
    • (130 reviews)
    • (128 reviews)
    • (127 reviews)
    • (117 reviews)
    • (113 reviews)
    • (107 reviews)
    • (107 reviews)
    • (106 reviews)
    • (103 reviews)
    • (94 reviews)
    • (94 reviews)
    • (88 reviews)
    • (85 reviews)
    • (83 reviews)
    • (79 reviews)
    • (74 reviews)
    • (74 reviews)
    • (72 reviews)
    • (70 reviews)
    • (67 reviews)
    • (65 reviews)
    • (64 reviews)
    • (63 reviews)
    • (63 reviews)
    • (54 reviews)
    • (50 reviews)
    • (45 reviews)
    • (44 reviews)
    • (43 reviews)
    • (43 reviews)
    • (43 reviews)
    • (43 reviews)
    • (42 reviews)
    • (39 reviews)
    • (39 reviews)
    • (36 reviews)
    • (35 reviews)
    • (32 reviews)
    • (31 reviews)
    • (26 reviews)
    • (26 reviews)
    • (24 reviews)
    • (24 reviews)
    • (24 reviews)
    • (24 reviews)
    • (21 reviews)
    • (20 reviews)
    • (20 reviews)
    • (19 reviews)
    • (18 reviews)
    • (18 reviews)
    • (16 reviews)
    • (16 reviews)
    • (15 reviews)
    • (14 reviews)
    • (14 reviews)
    • (13 reviews)
    • (12 reviews)
    • (12 reviews)
    • (12 reviews)
    • (12 reviews)
    • (11 reviews)
    • (11 reviews)
    • (11 reviews)
    • (10 reviews)
    • (10 reviews)
    • (8 reviews)
    • (7 reviews)
    • (7 reviews)
    • (7 reviews)
    • (7 reviews)
    • (7 reviews)
    • (7 reviews)
    • (6 reviews)
    • (6 reviews)
    • (6 reviews)
    • (6 reviews)
    • (6 reviews)
    • (6 reviews)
    • (5 reviews)
    • (5 reviews)
    • (5 reviews)
    • (5 reviews)
    • (4 reviews)
    • (4 reviews)
    • (4 reviews)
    • (4 reviews)
    • (4 reviews)
    • (4 reviews)
    • (4 reviews)
    • (4 reviews)
    • (4 reviews)
    • (4 reviews)
    • (4 reviews)
    • (4 reviews)
    • (4 reviews)
    • (3 reviews)
    • (3 reviews)
    • (3 reviews)
    • (3 reviews)
    • (3 reviews)
    • (3 reviews)
    • (3 reviews)
    • (3 reviews)
    • (3 reviews)
    • (3 reviews)
    • (3 reviews)
    • (3 reviews)
    • (3 reviews)
    • (3 reviews)
    • (3 reviews)
    • (2 reviews)
    • (2 reviews)
    • (2 reviews)
    • (2 reviews)
    • (2 reviews)
    • (2 reviews)
    • (2 reviews)
    • (2 reviews)
    • (2 reviews)
    • (2 reviews)
    • (2 reviews)
    • (2 reviews)
    • (2 reviews)
    • (2 reviews)
    • (2 reviews)
    • (2 reviews)
    • (2 reviews)
    • (2 reviews)
    • (2 reviews)
    • (2 reviews)
    • (2 reviews)
    • (2 reviews)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)
    • (1 review)

Year

  • 4.8 (3 reviews)
  • 4.6 (2 reviews)
  • 2.2 (3 reviews)
  • 4.8 (1 review)
  • 5 (1 review)
  • 3.7 (3 reviews)
  • 4.8 (4 reviews)
  • 4.9 (5 reviews)
  • 4.4 (7 reviews)
  • 4.6 (13 reviews)
  • 4.9 (12 reviews)
  • 4.9 (21 reviews)
  • 4.9 (42 reviews)
  • 4.9 (177 reviews)
  • 4.9 (100 reviews)
  • 4.9 (338 reviews)
  • 4.9 (621 reviews)
  • 4.9 (502 reviews)
  • 4.9 (540 reviews)
  • 4.8 (465 reviews)
  • 4.6 (315 reviews)
  • 4.7 (278 reviews)
  • 4.7 (683 reviews)
  • 4.7 (110 reviews)
  • 4.3 (29 reviews)
  • 4.6 (7 reviews)
  • 4.7 (6 reviews)
  • 4.3 (15 reviews)
  • 4.4 (9 reviews)
  • 4.2 (3 reviews)
  • 4.4 (11 reviews)
  • 4 (2 reviews)
  • 4.1 (12 reviews)
  • 4.7 (4 reviews)
  • 5 (1 review)
  • 4.9 (7 reviews)
  • 4.1 (7 reviews)
  • 4 (2 reviews)
  • 4.8 (6 reviews)
  • 4.9 (2 reviews)
  • 4 (2 reviews)
  • 4.3 (6 reviews)
  • 4.2 (4 reviews)
  • 4.4 (5 reviews)
  • 5 (2 reviews)
  • 4.5 (2 reviews)
  • 4.2 (1 review)

1995 Kawasaki reviews

4.3 (15 reviews)
Write a review
Reliability
4.2
Overall quality
4.3
Performance
4.3
Comfort
4.3

Top 10 Motorcycles

Reviews

Stars Refinement

15 ratings and reviews

Voted most helpful review

Reviewed on October 30, 2000

Motorcycle reviewed 1995 Kawasaki ZG1000-A10 Concours view listing

5.0
Bought my 95 used in Feb of 99 with 25000 miles. It now (10-00) has 48000 miles and has never once let me down. Always starts, and still has the "sport-bike-with-bags" feel that attracted me in the first place. You'll hear a lot of complaining about vibration on this bike from people who haven't... read more
Bought my 95 used in Feb of 99 with 25000 miles. It now (10-00) has 48000 miles and has never once let me down. Always starts, and still has the "sport-bike-with-bags" feel that attracted me in the first place. You'll hear a lot of complaining about vibration on this bike from people who haven't owned them very long. It's a SPORT BIKE, guys (and gals)! It's not gonna be as smooth as a Wing or Venture or even a Voyager (its cousin), but then, if you wanted THAT, you bought the wrong one. 1: Valve adjustments: must be done every 6250 miles. Yes, so every other oil change, you adjust the valves. Very simple. No shims...just a screwdriver and a 10mm wrench. Unless you're anal about it, they're usually close enough that you don't have to do any adjusting, but you should check them. It's NOT THAT HARD! Get a copy of "Chalkdust" from the Concours Owner's Group...walks you right through it. 2: They vibrate a lot. That copy of Chalkdust will get you through some of that vibration, too. 3: Uncomfortable seat: kind of subjective. I got used to mine with the stock seat/bar/peg set up and have NO problems with comfort, but if you MUST fiddle with it, there are many companies with aftermarket seats, "peg lowering" kits, and "bar changing" kits just waiting to hear from you. Personally, I think you should ride it for 8-10,000 miles before changing anything. You might just find (like I did), that the stock set-up is the most comfy. 3: It's "underbraked": Yes, probably if you're coming off a ZX7R or something else with equally great brakes, it needs a little help. OK "Braking" makes GREAT rotors for this bike, add some stainless lines and good EBC pads and you're "off to the races"! 4: Front end is weak: OK, you'd be too if you were carrying one of the most protective fairings in the industry, but, no problem. Go for the Progressive springs, and maybe even the GOLD VALVE Cartridge Emulators. You can make this little pig handle! don't forget that fork brace! 5: It's not as quick as my buddie's ZX-10: No, it's not supposed to be. But if you really want to "hot it up", check out Dale Walker's "Holeshot Performance" for a pipe and jet kit that will make your tour bike scream. Let me know if I left out your complaint, and I'll probably refute it with a fix. And the best thing is, you can pick one up CHEAP! If you haven't experienced the "Concours", TRY IT! A post '94 is better because of an improved fork set up, but I've seen folks absolutely SCREAM on 87's. BTW, I have 4 other bikes in my garage, and this is the one I ride most. The others are more "state of the art", but none "do it all" like my Concours!
Show less
Helpful (4)

FlagReport

Flag this review
Please select a reason
Voted most helpful review

Reviewed on August 3, 2000

Motorcycle reviewed 1995 Kawasaki VN1500-A9 Vulcan 88 view listing

4.0
Nice motorcycle BUT it needs a 5th gear for cruising on highways..... Handles good but could use longer handlebars so they could be edged lower for long... read more
Nice motorcycle BUT it needs a 5th gear for cruising on highways..... Handles good but could use longer handlebars so they could be edged lower for long rides.
Show less
Helpful (0)

FlagReport

Flag this review
Please select a reason
Voted most helpful review

Reviewed on July 5, 2000

Motorcycle reviewed 1995 Kawasaki ZG1000-A10 Concours view listing

3.0
Generally a very nice bike for regular riding. Worth the money and an inexpensive used bike purchase. It has been a very dependable machine and convenient with the cases and fairing protection. I commute 60 mi/day with 20 in city, remaining 2-lane country. 43 mpg overall, up to 50 mpg on longer... read more
Generally a very nice bike for regular riding. Worth the money and an inexpensive used bike purchase. It has been a very dependable machine and convenient with the cases and fairing protection. I commute 60 mi/day with 20 in city, remaining 2-lane country. 43 mpg overall, up to 50 mpg on longer rides. The warts are the weight, the buzz, valve adjustment interval and heat buildup in city driving. Between 45-65 mph the bike is comfy. On the interstate in traffic at 70-75 the vibration is too noticeable for comfort and tough on the hands after 1/2 hour. Weight makes it hard to move in parking situations but not noticeable when underway. Weight prevents easy use of centerstand. Heat buildup in the summer in the city is bad. If Kawasaki tuned it for more low-end torque, hydraulic valves, EFI and rubber engine mounts I'd buy another. If not - my next is a BMW-RT. If I have to wait till Concours breaks down, I'll never get the Beemer. Can't go wrong with a Concours - great for the guy who would prefer a bike to a car for getting around.
Show less
Helpful (2)

FlagReport

Flag this review
Please select a reason
Voted most helpful review

Reviewed on June 16, 2000

Motorcycle reviewed 1995 Kawasaki VN750-A11 Vulcan view listing

4.0
The black/teal color scheme for the 95' is one of the best ever. This bike doesn't bite back, very forgiving, good for beginner, but has enough lean angle that an experienced rider can have fun. Very reliable, with lots of nice features- center stand, tach, shaft drive. It was my first bike.... read more
The black/teal color scheme for the 95' is one of the best ever. This bike doesn't bite back, very forgiving, good for beginner, but has enough lean angle that an experienced rider can have fun. Very reliable, with lots of nice features- center stand, tach, shaft drive. It was my first bike. Since then I've had sport bikes, muscle bikes etc... The VN750 continues to please with acceleration able to keep up (or pull away) with all but the fastest cruisers. Magazine editors say its ugly....don't believe it, why is it still a strong seller after 16 YEARS !!!
Show less
Helpful (0)

FlagReport

Flag this review
Please select a reason
Voted most helpful review

Reviewed on March 31, 2000

Motorcycle reviewed 1995 Kawasaki VN750-A11 Vulcan view listing

5.0
As a returning rider, I wanted a bike that was easy to handle and maintain. With shaft drive and hydraulic lifters, there is virtually no maintenance to this bike. Good handling and its forgiving nature make it an excellent entry level... read more
As a returning rider, I wanted a bike that was easy to handle and maintain. With shaft drive and hydraulic lifters, there is virtually no maintenance to this bike. Good handling and its forgiving nature make it an excellent entry level bike.
Show less
Helpful (0)

FlagReport

Flag this review
Please select a reason
  • 1
  • 2