Voted most helpful review
Reviewed on January 9, 2001
I'm not aware of any other bike that gives you this much bang for the buck. It's reliable, powerful, quick/fast, not ugly, cheap to insure (considering the performance, nimble (for a 500 pound bike), and reasonably comfortable. I've had a 94 model for 4 years and own a few other newer bikes (2...
read more
I'm not aware of any other bike that gives you this much bang for the buck. It's reliable, powerful, quick/fast, not ugly, cheap to insure (considering the performance, nimble (for a 500 pound bike), and reasonably comfortable. I've had a 94 model for 4 years and own a few other newer bikes (2 Harleys and a KLR650 dual sport). There are a few nits to consider. The cam on the first year model makes a ticking sound, which the dealer claims isn't harmful and will not shorten engine life (You can look up service bulletin number 1 on Honda's site.) The engine is exceptionally smooth and power is linear. When you get the revs up, it's a hoot! The clutch isn't grabby and requires very little lever force to operate. While the brakes are adequate, I find the front a little soft at times and the rear drum difficult to modulate compared to the rear disks on my other bikes. While I don't like the brakes, they are reasonably effective and reliable. The small fuel tank limits your range and the fuel economy isn't great (low 30's), but the bike goes like a bat! Consider a windscreen. This bike seems to channel air into your torso and face rather than try to split it above and around you. Finally, I've kept the bike mostly for my newbie 18 year old son to ride. I have a better cruiser and a touring bike. The Magna is an odd duck. It's capable of doing anything (cruise, tour, twisties), but does nothing exceptionally well. On the other hand, if you don't have much to spend and can own only one bike, you can do alot worse than a Magna. I'm due to add a more sporty bike to the fleet.
Show less