1992 Honda reviews

This bike is no longer for the timid and shy. It's been modified and I strongly urge others not to mimic this until you've logged a few riding years under your belt and many thousands of miles behind you. It's a hardtail, a rigid rear sans suspension. It's low, much lower than the designers ever had in mind (under 24" seat height!). It's raked, 4" over front end. And it's loud, thanks to the hypercharger and DG Performance pipes. Low end power is phenomenal, and it really moves out, as long as the road is straight and smooth. I like it, it's fun and different. Others voted it tops in my stable. Here it is, the bike I call "VLX-Max." SS Show less

I bought my 1995 Nighthawk 750 used in the Spring of 2001. It had slightly less than 2500 miles on it and was stock. I bought it on the opposite side of the country from where I live, so I took some time to get to the East coast and ride it home. Before leaving Boston, I installed some accessories: The factory case savers and centerstand, Givi wing rack and three hard bags, a Kriss Industries Headlight modulator and Tailgunner brake light flasher. The ride was pleasantly uneventful and totally free of mechanical problems, in spite of riding two up and exceeding the GVWR by 75 lbs or so. As a fifty-ish re-entry rider--my first bike was a Norton Commando Interstate--I'm completely pleased with this motorcycle. The motorcycle magazines are routinely underwhelmed with this bike, but that's because it does everything well, but excells at nothing. There are faster bikes, but this bike is more than fast enough and quick enough for a rider with nothing to prove. There are bikes that handle better, but how many riders can fully explore those limits on the street? Raised on what is now called "standard" motorcycles, the appearance of this bike is very pleasing to me. Add to that the low maintenance-lube the chain, change the oil-and this is a near perfect motorcyle, IMHO. Could it have better brakes? Sure, but the stockers are fine, and there are cheap and easy up-grades available. Better suspension? Yeah, more state-of-the-art boingers would be nice, but, again, for most people, these are just fine, and they can be up-graded, too. In a motorcycle world where way too much horsepower is frequently considered not enough, this bike doesn't stand out. For the guy who wants a good bike that doesn't pretend to be anything other than what it is, it's a fine bike. Kurt Jensen Show less

I bought my 1992 CB750 Nighthawk just recently. I bought it second-hand from a guy who'd actually bought 2 years before for his girlfriend. Well...the girlfriend lost interest and bang!!! I found searching online for a bike. I have to tell you, first bike, second bike or last bike, the Nighthawk is great. Like I said, mine's a '92 with less than 5000 miles. It looks almost exactly the same as the '02 model. It will knock your socks off zero to 60 -- it's no Yamaha VMax, but it'll go. I'm a big guy (6'3", 250 lbs) and it is great for me. The bike's very light in comparison to just about all others I've ridden. The corner handling is great as well. The Nighthawk sits pretty high off the ground, so you tall folks should enjoy it. A suggestion would be to buy a set of custom footpegs to fit on your custom chrome engine guard as well to stretch out on for longer journeys. Once you get to 60 in 5th gear it'll still get up and go pretty well if you're worried about passing other vehicles. To sum this up, I probably won't let my Nighthawk go either, once I'm ready for another one. Excellent all-around bike and you just cannot get more for your money. Show less

Bought mine in 95 and I love It. Put new Bridgestones on it at 10,000 miles upgraded the chain and at 15,000 miles still runs like a top. This bike is an all around good buy for the money. It's not a speed demon but it will go fast enough to kill you. Moving up to a Calif. Guzzi this fall but I'm keeping the Nighthawk. Ride safe. Show less

outgrown quickly The Nighthawk is a fabulous first bike. Small, easy to maintain & maneuver, perfect for the beginner, especially those with smaller frames. No wonder it's an MSF course favorite. Not suitable for higher speeds or interstate travel which is its greatest disadvantage. High vibration on the pegs and handgrips at higher speeds. Forget riding two up, it's miserable back there. It took me 6 months before I was seriously shopping around for more power. Show less

I hadn't ridden in 44 years when I bought my 92 Nighthawk in Sept 2000. It's sure a great bike to get back into the sport with. I only paid $2200 for it, and it's been trouble free so far. I've put almost a 1000 miles on it. It got me hooked again. I bought a 2000 Harley FXDL the next month, but I couldn't get rid of the Nighthawk. It's just to much fun to ride. I'm going to keep it for as long as I'm riding. Show less

I have a 92, which I bought in 96. I have used this bike for commuting and touring and it has proven very reliable, very good gas mileage, and smooth running. With soft luggage, you can travel anywhere. Installed Michelin radial tires, made for smoother ride, good handling. Could use some improvements to suspension. Overall a great bike for the money. Show less